Mid-to-Large Integrated Delivery System Project Tracking
Central Project Management System
All Information System Department projects are tracked in a central Microsoft Enterprise Project Management (EPM) system. All project managers (PMs) are expected to maintain their project work plans in EPM. A small Project Office (PO) runs reports to validate this.
Some other areas of our Delivery System use stand-alone Microsoft Project Plans, Excel Spreadsheets, Sharepoint Lists or hosted project management services. The Delivery System does not have a single PO for all projects in all areas.
Methodology and Project Office
A common project methodology that was extracted from the Project Management Institute's PMBoK. This defines deliverable standards, templates and checklists that are used by the PMs. Few of the deliverables are mandated (proposal, work breakdown structure, status report, change control, notice of completion). The PO continually updates the project methodology as improvements are recommended. We are honestly limited in our approach to versioning the changes and rolling them out to PMs which has been an ongoing challenge.
The common project methodology contains standard work-breakdown structure (WBS) items that are tracked via reports to provide some level of consistent reporting and analysis. The issue has been the need for customization of the WBS items which can make standardized reporting difficult. The lack of standardization has hampered efforts to really estimate what are seemingly comparable projects. It is not perfect but it is a start.
The PO provides training to new PMs and helps the existing staff. They also support EPM and the reporting.
Communication Tools
Major projects use a Sharepoint Services Site for tracking of deliverables. The Sharepoint Services Sites can be searched from a Portal Site.
A standard status report is used for larger projects. This has made a difference in project visibility beyond the standard work plan reports.
Improvements in the New Year
We hope to improve the following in 2008 -
1. Single Issues Database for large projects - not individual lists
2. More structure to the WBS with some new items by the type of project (for ex: version upgrade, new install, web development, network upgrade)
3. Use of Sharepoint Lists for key follow-up's
4. More rigor to training and change management for the project methodology
5. Alignment of system development approaches
6. Improve resource management
__________________
Friend of Bob Saccamano
& a Van Buren Boy
|